Fulminant myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination rescued with venoarterial ECMO: A report of two cases

Objectives: Cases of fulminant myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination have been reported. The most severe may need venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support. Here we report two cases successfully rescued with V-A ECMO. Method(s): We included all the cases supported with V-A ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock due to myocarditis secondary to a mRNA SARS-COV2 vaccine in the high-volume adult ECMO Program in Vall Hebron University Hospital since January 2020. Result(s): We identified two cases (table). One of them was admitted for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In both, a peripheral V-A ECMO was implanted in the cath lab. An intra-aortic balloon pump was needed in one case for left ventricle unloading. Support could be successfully withdrawn in a mean of five days. No major bleeding or thrombosis complications occurred. Definite microscopic diagnosis could be reached in one case (Image, 3). Treatment was the same, using 1000mg of methylprednisolone/day for 3 days. A cardiac magnetic resonance 10 days after admission showed a significant improvement in systolic function and diffuse oedema and subepicardial contrast intake in different segments (Image, 1-2). Both patients were discharged fully recovered. Conclusion(s): V-A ECMO should be established in cases of COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis with refractory cardiogenic shock during the acute phase. (Table Presented).

Medical intensivist directed VV ECMO cannulation for the facilitation of tracheostomy in a patient with severe tracheal stenosis: A case report

Objectives: We present a case report of medical intensivist driven ECMO program using ECMO as a pre-procedural tool to maintain oxygenation in a patient with critical tracheal stenosis during tracheostomy placement. Method(s): VV ECMO is primarily used to support patients when mechanical ventilation is unable to provide adequate gas exchange. Alternatively, it has been used pre-procedurally when intubation is required in anticipation of a difficult airway. Described here is the first intensivist preformed awake VV ECMO cannulation to facilitate tracheostomy in a patient with severe tracheal stenosis. Result(s): The patient is a 41-year-old female with the relevant background of COVID19 pneumonia status post tracheostomy and subsequently decannulated after prolonged intubation and ICU stay. As a result, the patient developed symptomatic tracheal stenosis and presented two years after her ICU stay for scheduled bronchoscopy and balloon dilation. However, the patient developed worsening stridor and shortness of breath requiring heliox and BPAP. After multidisciplinary discussion between the critical care team ENT teams, the decision was made to cannulate for VV ECMO as a pre-procedural maneuver to allow for oxygenation during open tracheostomy in the OR. Dexmedetomidine and local anesthesia were used for the procedure with the patient sitting at 30 degrees on non-invasive ventilation and heliox. The patient was cannulated with a 21F right internal jugular return cannula and 25F right common femoral drainage cannula by medical intensivists in the intensive care unit using ultrasound guidance. The patient went for operative tracheostomy the next day and was subsequently decannulated from ECMO the following day without complication. She was discharged home on trach collar. Conclusion(s): Intensivist performed ECMO cannulation has been shown to be safe and effective. We anticipate the indications and use will continue to expand. This case is an example that intensivist driven preprocedural ECMO is a viable extension of that practice.

Totally Percutaneus Veno-Venous ECMO Therapy for COVID 19 Patients. Bridge to Recovery or Lung Transplantation?

Objective: Multiple major health organisations recommend the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. Method(s): From march 2020 to november 2021 we done 108 veno-venous ECMO therapies. 35 patients required implantation immediately in intensive care unit in place of call by mobile ECMO team. Depend from distance of call it was used medical ambulance, rescue helicopter or medical plane. Result(s): In the first analyzed period (March-December 2020), 90-day mortality was 41%. 8 (7.6%) patients were discharged from the Intensive Care Unit. The remaining 3 (4.2%) were discharged home. 7 patients (6.6%) had both lung transplants. 7 patients (6.6%) required conversion to VV-A ECMO therapy due to the development of acute heart failure. Conclusion(s): In the analyzed period of March-December 2020, the mortality was 41%. As a result, the lower effect of regression of consolidation and inflammatory lesions of lung tissue indicates that ECMO therapy remains the treatment method in high-risk patients as a bridge therapy to lung transplantation.

A New Registry for Genetic Diagnosis of Inborn Errors of Immunity within the Military Health System

Genotypic definition of monogenic inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) continues to accelerate with broader access to next generation sequencing, underscoring this aggregated group of disorders as a major health burden impacting both civilian and military populations. At an estimated prevalence of 1 in 1200 individuals, IEIs affect ~8,000 patients within the Military Health System (MHS). Despite access to targeted gene/exome panels at military treatment facilities, most affected patients never receive a definitive genetic diagnosis that would significantly improve clinical care. To address this gap, we established the first registry of IEI patients within the MHS with the goal of identifying known and novel pathogenic genetic defects to increase diagnosis rates and enhance clinical care. Using the registry, a research protocol was opened in July 2022. Since July we have enrolled 75 IEI patients encompassing a breadth of phenotypes including severe and recurrent infections, bone marrow failure, autoimmunity/autoinflammation, atopic disease, and malignancy. Enrolled patients provide blood and bone marrow samples for whole genome, ultra-deep targeted panel and comprehensive transcriptome sequencing, plus cryopreservation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells for future functional studies. We are also implementing and developing analytical methods for identifying and interrogating non-coding and structural variants. Suspected pathogenic variants are adjudicated by a clinical molecular geneticist using state-of-the-art analysis pipelines. These analyses subsequently inform in vitro experiments to validate causative mutations using cell reporter systems and primary patient cells. Clinical variant validation and return of genetic results are planned with genetic counseling provided. As a proof of principle, this integrated genetic evaluation pipeline revealed a novel, candidate TLR7 nonsense variant in two adolescent brothers who both endured critical COVID-19 pneumonia, requiring mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Our protocol is therefore poised to greatly enrich clinical genetics resources available in the MHS for IEI patients, contributing to better diagnosis rates, informed family counseling, and targeted treatments that collectively improve the health and readiness of the military community. Moreover, our efforts should yield new mechanistic insights on immune pathogenesis for a broad variety of known and novel IEIs.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Non-trauma uses of viscoelastic hemostatic assays in critical care: A narrative review and primer for pharmacists

Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are point-of-care viscoelastic tests of whole blood that provide real-time analyses of coagulation. TEG and ROTEM are often used to guide blood product administration in the trauma and surgical settings. These tests are increasingly being explored for their use in other disease states encountered in critically ill patients and in the management of antithrombotic medications. As the medication experts, pharmacists should be familiar with how to interpret and apply viscoelastic tests to disease state and medication management. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a primer for pharmacists on viscoelastic tests and their interpretation and to explore non-trauma indications for viscoelastic testing in critical care. Literature evaluating the use of TEG and ROTEM for patients with acute and chronic liver disease, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, coronavirus disease 2019, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are described. Current applications of viscoelastic tests by pharmacists and potential future roles of critical care pharmacists in expanding the use of viscoelastic tests are summarized.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. JACCP: Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Two-year outcome of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19 related severe respiratory failure

Objectives: We sought to evaluate 2-year outcome of V-V ECMO support for COVID-19 related severe respiratory failure in our center. Method(s): Retrospective analysis of 41 consecutive patients (73% male, mean age 51.6+/-14.2 years, mean BMI 35.1+/-12.5 kg/m2) with critical hypoxemic and/or hypercapnic refractory respiratory failure (mean P/F ratio 67.9+/-14.3 mmHg, mean pCO2 77.6.0+/-185.7 mmHg, Murray Score 3.71+/-0.4) on V-V ECMO support from October 2020 to January 2022 Results: With mean support duration of 234.4+/-63.2 hours, 29 patients (70.7%) were successfully weaned off. Finally, 19 of them (46.3%) were discharged home with good neurological outcome (CPC 1,2). During followup, 30-day, 6-, 12-, and 24 -month survival rate was 61.3%, 46.2%, 41.9%, and 41,9% respectively. In survivor group shorter symptoms onset to respiratory failure time (4+/-4.7 vs. 7+/-6.7 days, p=0.04), higher P/F ration (86+/-41.5 vs. 65+/-37.5 mmHg, p=0.04) and norepinephrine support (0.03+/-0.06 vs. 0.09+/-0.12 ug/kg/min, p=0.04), and lower IL-6 level (12.3+/-7.5 vs. 25.9+/-8.8 ng/l, p=0.03) p=0.01) were analysed before cannulation. Mean in-ICU stay and in-hospital stay in survivors;groups reached 32.5+/-27.7 days and 42.6+/-35.8 days, respectively. All long-term survivors (17 patients) complained about slight functional health limitation only with normal 6MWT (542.6+/- 89.2 min), near to normal spirometry parameters (FEV/VC 87+/-7.4%, DLCO 63.1+/-13.7%, KCO 82.,1+/-19.4%) and minimal neurological disability (CPC 1-2) Conclusion(s): 2-year outcome of V-V ECMO support in COVID-19 severe respiratory failure is acceptable even in the scope of low-volume ECMO centre. Reported functional status of long-term survivors was good despite the complicated and prolonged in-hospital stay. (Table Presented).

Association Between Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection and De Novo HLA Donor Specific Antibody Production in Lung Transplant Recipients: Single-center study

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients (LTR). Respiratory viral infections may be associated with de-novo HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) production and impact lung transplant outcome. Since one of the immunomodulation strategies post-SARS-CoV-2 infection in LTR include decreasing or holding anti-metabolites, concerns have been raised for higher incidence of de-novo DSA production in LTR. Method(s): We performed a retrospective chart review of 80 consecutive LTR diagnosed with COVID-19 to investigate this concern. COVID-19 disease severity was divided into 3 groups: mild, moderate, and severe. Mild disease was defined as patients with COVID-19 diagnosis who were stable enough to be treated as out-patients. Moderate disease was defined as patients who required admission to the hospital and were on less than 10 liters of oxygen at rest. Severe disease was identified as patients who required hospitalization and were on more than 10 liters of oxygen with or without mechanical ventilation or extra corporal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Result(s): A total of 23, 47, and 10 LTR were diagnosed with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 respectively. De-novo HLA DSAwere detected in 0/23 (0%), 3/47 (6.3%), and 4/10 (40%) LTR with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 respectively (p = 0.0007) within 6 months post-COVID-19 diagnosis. Conclusion(s): Severe COVID-19 may be associated with increased risk of de novo HLA DSA production resulting in allograft dysfunction.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

The impact of COVID-19 on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA): A single centre study

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has been affecting everything including ECMO service. At the moment we have to equip PPE before ECPR and we thought it may influence on time to establish venoarterial ECMO and patient outcomes. Method(s): We compared OHCA-patients who underwent ECPR in our hospital before (January 2015 - March 2020) and after (April 2020 - December 2022) the Government of Japan declared a state of emergency in relation to COVID-19. Result(s): There were 32 and 9 patients in the pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic sample. Of these, 9 (28.1%) vs. 5 (55.6%) survived extracorporeal life support (ECLS), p=0.23, and 4 (12.5%) vs. 2 (22.2%) had good neurologic outcomes (cerebral performance category 1- 2) after ECLS. Seven (21.9%) vs. 1 (12.5%) were discharged or transferred alive from the hospital (one patient of the post-COVID-19 cohort has been still hospitalised for rehabilitation), p>0.99. Mean values of low-flow time were respectively 67.3 minutes (SD 18.3) and 55.6 minutes (SD 17.1), p=0.091, and median values of time to establish ECMO from admission were respectively 32.5 minutes (IQR 15.8) and 26.0 minutes (IQR 4.0), p=0.23. Conclusion(s): There were no differences in time-toECMO or outcomes in patients who underwent ECPR for refractory OHCA before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Omicron driven ECMO in a vaccinated critically ill patient

Objectives: Reporting a case of a COVID-19 vaccinated patient admitted to our intensive care unit with severe acute respiratory failure due to SARSCoV2 - Omicron variant, rapidly deteriorating requiring intubation, prone ventilation, and ECMO support. Method(s): A 62 years old Caucasian male was admitted in ICU for rapidly deranging respiratory failure and fever which occurred over the previous 24h. The patient received two doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccine (Oxford, AstraZeneca), the last one over five months before onset of symptoms. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with tachypnea, low peripheral saturation (80%), elevated serum creatinine (2.4 mg/dl), and mild obesity (BMI 34,6). Pressure support ventilation trial (2 hours) failed carryng out to orotracheal intubation and protective ventilation. Worsening of respiratory exchanges (5 th day from the admission) required a rescue prone ventilation cycle, in the meantime an indication was given to the placement of veno-venous ECMO. The cannulation site was femoro-femoral and the configuration used was Vivc25- Va21, according to the current ELSO nomenclature;ECMO flow was progressively increased until a peripheral saturation of 95% was obtained. Result(s): The patient passed out after 2 month of extracorporeal support with no sign of recovery of pulmonary and renal function. Conclusion(s): Unlike evidences showing a lower symptomatic engagement of the Omicron variant SARSCoV2 positive patients, we have witnessed a rapid and massive pulmonary involvement. The short time that passed from the onset of symptoms and the rapid decay of respiratory function required rapid escalation of the intensity of care up to extracorporeal support. The patient showed previous pathologies that can lead to suspicion of a loss of immune coverage given by the vaccine, in addition to the long time elapsed since the last dose. (Figure Presented).

Prolonged unconsciousness in severe COVID-19 infection with veno-venous ECMO support

Objectives: Patients with severe COVID-19 infections have been shown to have prolonged periods of coma followed by meaningful neurological recovery. Therefore, neurological prognostication is challenging, particularly in those who require veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) support. We hoped to evaluate which variables can be considered when trying to predict neurological recovery. Method(s): We conducted a case-control retrospective chart review of patients on VV-ECMO from March 2020 to January 2022. This time-frame was selected to limit the effect of post-pandemic changes in sedation practices. Our outcome was duration of unconsciousness, defined as days with GCS motor score <6. We first conducted a matched cohort analysis, comparing COVID and non-COVID patients. We then performed a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis to determine the Relative Variable Importance (RVI) of clinical variables associated with duration of unconsciousness. Result(s): Our matched analysis included 52 patients, 27 (52%) of whom had COVID-19. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the groups (Table 1). Patients with COVID-19 had a significantly longer median duration on ECMO (p<0.001) and hospital length of stay (p=0.003). The median duration of unconsciousness was similar between COVID-19 and non-COVID patients (p=0.58). The CART analysis results (Figure 1) showed that the most important variables to predict duration of unconsciousness were successive variations in GCS (RVI 100%) and GCS standard deviation (RVI 99%). COVID positivity only had a weak predictability (RVI 4%). Conclusion(s): Our analysis has shown that in patients on VV-ECMO, those with COVID-19 spent a longer time on ECMO and in the hospital. While there was no significant difference in the duration of unconsciousness, we found that patients who had high fluctuations of GCS during ECMO had a shorter duration of coma. (Figure Presented).

A Review on the Effect of COVID-19 in Pregnant Women

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging disease with a rapid increase in cases and deaths since its first discovery in December 2019, in Wuhan, China. Limited data are available on COVID-19 effects during pregnancy;however, information on diseases associated with other highly pathogenic coronaviruses (i.e. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome [SARS] and the Middle East respiratory syndrome [MERS]) may provide insight into the effects of COVID-19 during pregnancy. Coronaviruses cause illnesses ranging from the common cold to severe respiratory disease and death. The data indicate an average of 5 days incubation period (range: 2-14 days). The average age range of the hospitalized patients was 49-56 years, and a third to half of them have an underlying illness. Children were rarely mentioned. Within hospitalized cases, men were more frequent (54%-73%). Fever, cough, myalgia, vomiting, and diarrhea are common symptoms. This review aims at giving an in-depth understanding of COVID-19 by comparing its effects with SARS and MERS to evaluate its severity in pregnant women1. The results of varied studies show that COVID-19 affects pregnant women seriously and there is an alarming need to look into this aspect to prevent its harmful effects on the fetus.Copyright © 2020

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation instead of invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pneumomediastinum: A cohort trial

Objectives: In patients with severe respiratory failure, invasive ventilation may deteriorate the pneumomediastinum and hypoxia. This study aimed to compare the mortality and the complications of the patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related severe ARDS treated with invasive ventilation or veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) to avoid intubation. We hypothesized that VV-ECMO support without prior intubation is a feasible alternative strategy to invasive ventilation. Method(s): This retrospective study evaluated patients with COVID-19 related severe respiratory failure and radiological evidence of pneumomediastinum. The primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) survival at 90 days. Result(s): Out of 347 patients with COVID-19 disease treated in our unit, 22 patients developed spontaneous pneumomediastinum associated with deterioration of respiratory function. In 13 patients (59%), invasive ventilation was chosen as initial respiratory support;in 9 patients (41%), VV-ECMO was chosen as initial respiratory support. The median age of the patients in the invasive ventilation group was 62 years (IQR: 49-69) compared to 53 years (IQR: 46-62) in ECMO group (P=0.31). No statistically significant difference in SAPS II score between the groups was observed (39.7 (IQR: 33.2-45.3) vs. 28.9 (IQR:28.4-34.6), P=0.06). No elevated fluid balance within the first 4 days was observed in the ECMO group compared to the invasive ventilation group (162 mL (IQR: -366-2000) vs. 3905 mL (IQR: 2068-6192), P=0.07). VV-ECMO as the initial strategy for supporting patients with severe respiratory failure and pneumomediastinum, was associated with lower 90 days mortality (HR: 0.33 95%-CI: 0.11-0.97, P= 0.04) compared to patients treated with invasive ventilation (Figure). Conclusion(s): VV-ECMO can be an alternative strategy to invasive ventilation for treating patients with severe respiratory failure and spontaneous pneumomediastinum. (Figure Presented).

Interhospital ECMO transport during Covid-19 pandemic: A clinical experince

Objectives: During COVID pandemic, ECMO support for the patients with ARDS have saved many lives. Although its an important and effective treatment modality, management of ECMO could be done in a few specialized centers. In this study, we share our in- and out-of-city ECMO transport experience of the patients with COVID-ARDS. Method(s): A total of 75 patients (57% male- 43 %female) were included in this study. The decision ECMO support, initiation at referral hospital, and transport process of all of the patients to our centre were performed by our mobile ECMO team. All transports were done by land ambulance Results: Mean age of the patients was 43.4+/-11.5 years. Mean intubation period before ECMO support was 8.5 +/-8.3 days. We transferred 14 patients from the centers within the city and 12 patients from the centers outside the city to our hospital. Mean distance between our center and the referral center was 36,2 kms (max 269- min 1). We did not experience any major complication during transport. A total of 30 patients (38,6 %) were weaned from ECMO and discharged from hospital. Conclusion(s): ECMO support is an advanced treatment modality for pulmonary failure patients. The decision of initiation, cannulation, transport and management should be performed by experienced centers to achive acceptable results.

The impact of deprivation on Respiratory Support Unit outcomes in COVID-19 patients, and highlights from wave 2 data in Portsmouth

Background: The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant demand for beds capable of delivering enhanced respiratory support. NHS England recommended the use of CPAP for patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure, a treatment which can be offered outside of a critical care facility, and on a Respiratory High Care/ Support Unit (RSU). The enhancement of Portsmouth's RSU provided CPAP and NIV for patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure. With our intensive care facilities at 300% their normal capacity, this greatly alleviated bed pressures on critical care. Varied levels of deprivation exist in Portsmouth's dense population. Deprivation has an impact on overall health, however the effect of postcode on outcomes for people going onto support for COVID-19 respiratory failure, is unknown. Method(s): Retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients admitted to Respiratory Support Unit during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, from 02/11/2020 to 31/01/2021. 227 patients were included in the study with 8 removed due to incomplete data, all of the patients received respiratory support in the form of CPAP or NIV. We collected multivariate data including biochemical markers, demographics, oxygenation status, co-morbidities and outcomes. Outcomes measured were: 1) Death in RSU, 2) Discharge from RSU or 3) Intubation and Ventilation. To measure deprivation, we linked a persons postcode to an area called an LSOA (Lower-layer Super Output Area). These are small areas of similar population size, each of which has a deprivation score (ie. top 10%, to the lowest 10% areas of deprivation in the UK). This is measured using an 'index of multiple deprivation'. An individual's outcome from the RSU was then analysed in relation to the deprivation score allocated to their postcode. Result(s): We observed a significant number of patients discharged from RSU, without needing invasive mechanical ventilation. 80/219 were discharged directly. 45/219 died in RSU, and 94 were eventually admitted to ITU. The average stay on CPAP or NIV before needing admission to ITU was 3 days. Some biochemical markers which stood out in relation to the outcomes described were as follows: average LDH, D-dimer and Troponin levels were higher in those who were admitted to intensive care. In patients who died, the PCT was significantly higher on average when compared to the other two groups. In the group who were discharged, mean lymphocyte count was >1, in the other two groups this was <1. From our observations in Portsmouth, there is a negative correlation between deprivation and lower aged individuals admitted for COVID-19 related respiratory support. Overall, we also saw disproportionate representation of those from the most deprived 50% of the UK in our respiratory support unit. Conclusion(s): CPAP and NIV can effectively be used in an RSU during a spike of COVID-19, to safely minimise demand on critical care services. Deprivation may have an impact on outcomes in patients needing respiratory support related to COVID-19. Deprivation levels may help predict risk of needing enhanced respiratory support in certain age groups. Multiple biochemical markers may be of prognostic value in COVID-19.

VV-ECMO in critical COVID-19 obese patients

Objectives: Obesity is a condition prone to pose difficulties to a successful extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Not being a contraindication, it yields significant challenges to physicians and may interfere with patient;s outcome. The number of obese patients supported by ECMO has increased during COVID-19 pandemic due to severe illness in this population. We designed a retrospective study in order to identify prognostic factors for 180-day survival in critical COVID-19 obese patients in venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO). Method(s): Single-center retrospective cohort of critical COVID-19 adult patients in VV-ECMO, obese and overweight (according to WHO classification), admitted in a tertiary hospital;s ICU from April 1st 2020 to May 31th2022. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess 180-day mortality differences. Result(s): The analysis included 41 patients. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] age was 55 (IQR 45-60) years and 70,7% were male. Median body mass index (BMI) was 36 (IQR 31-42,5) Kg/m2 ;39% of patients had a BMI >=40 kg/m2 . The sampling had 3 (IQR 1,5-4) days of invasive ventilation prior to ECMO and 63,4% were weaned from ECMO-VV support after a median of 19 (IQR 10-34) days. The median ICU length of stay was 31,9 (IQR 17,5-44,5) days. The invasive ventilation period was 30 (IQR 19-49,5) days. The 60, 90 and 180-day mortalities were 41,5%. On the univariate logistic regression analysis we found that higher BMI was associated with higher 180-day survival (odds ratio [OR] 1,157 (1,038-1,291), p 0,009). Younger age, female patients, less invasive ventilation time prior to ECMO and fewer complications at time of ECMO cannulation were associated with higher 180-day survival [respectively, OR 0,858 (0,774- 0,953), p 0,004;OR 0,074 (0,008-0,650), p 0,019;OR 0,612 (0,401-0,933), p 0.022;OR 0.13 (0,03-0,740), p 0,022)]. Conclusion(s): In this retrospective cohort of critical COVID-19 obese adult patients supported by VVECMO, a higher BMI, younger age and female patients were associated with higher 180-day survival. A shorter invasive ventilation time prior to ECMO and fewer complications at ECMO cannulation were also associated with increased survival.

Could out-of-centre initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with mobile equipment improve outcome and prognosis in COVID-19 patients? A retrospective study from the ECMO centre Regensburg

Objectives: Besides in-centre ECMO care, the certificated ECMO centre of the University Hospital Regensburg (UKR) offers out-of-centre ECMO initiation with mobile equipment. During the pandemic situation, this treatment was especially meant for patients with critical cardiopulmonary failure in remote hospitals who present themselves as too unstable for interhospital transfer. We evaluated if treatment with outof-centre ECMO initiation could benefit patients;outcome, by comparing this group with a group of COVID-19 patients who received ECMO therapy at the UKR by in-hospital initiation. Method(s): Retrospective single-centre study including 169 patients who received ECMO due to COVID-19- induced cardiopulmonary failure between March 2020 till March 2022. Patients;population was separated into two groups according to the location of ECMO initiation, out-of-centre or in-centre, and into two subgroups by the used ECMO mode, venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA). We compared demographics, treatment duration, adverse events and patient;s outcome. The primary endpoint of the investigation was patients;survival to hospital discharge rate or death on ECMO or after ECMO explant. Result(s): Regarding the total study population, 98 (58.0%) of the 169 patients could be discharged from the UKR. Before initiation of ECMO therapy and with regard to complications during the course of intensive care, such as renal failure requiring dialysis or bleeding, there were no relevant differences between the two groups and subgroups. The out-of-centre group showed a significantly higher survival rate with 70 (63.6%) survivors out of 110 externally cannulated patients. Conclusion(s): In the study population, external ECMO cannulation was beneficial in terms of survival, although the reasons did not show significant differences between the groups. A possible approach for the good overall survival of the study groups in international comparison could be the existing centre expertise. (Figure Presented).

Incidence of heparin resistance and heparin failure in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - an exploratory retrospective analysis

Objectives: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains the anticoagulation of choice at most centres for patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). One disadvantage of UFH relies on its individual dosing requirement to achieve target values. In this context heparin resistance has been described, defined as doses exceeding 35,000 IU UFH/d. However, the incidence of heparin resistance and its association with thromboembolic complications despite anticoagulation within target ranges remains unknown. Method(s): This retrospective study included adults receiving venovenous (VV) and venoarterial (VA) ECMO, or extracorporeal CO2-removal (ECCO2R) between 2010 and May 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of heparin resistance (>35,000 IU of UFH/d). Secondary outcomes were heparin failure (thromboembolic complications despite anticoagulation within target ranges) and survival. A multivariable poisson regression model was fitted to analyse the effect of heparin resistance, COVID-19 and ECMO type on the incidence rate of thromboembolic events. Result(s): Of 197 included patients, 33 (16.8%) had heparin resistance. Patients with COVID-19 (n=51) had a higher rate of heparin resistance compared to nonCOVID-19 patients (37% vs. 9.6%, P<0.001). Thromboembolic complications occurred at a rate of 5.89/100 ECMO days. There was a significant effect of COVID-19 (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4 to 3.3, P<0.001) and ECMO type (VA ECMO: IRR 2.35;95% CI 1.43 to 3.87, P<0.001;ECCO2R: IRR 2.63, 95% CI 1.37 to 4.9, P=0.003;reference VV ECMO) on incidence rate of thromboembolic events, but not of heparin resistance (IRR 1.11, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.76, P=0.7). ECMO duration was longer (25d (IQR 11-33) vs. 8d (IQR 4-18), P<0.001) in patients with heparin resistance, but hospital survival did not differ (23 (70%) vs. 91 (57%), P=0.2). Conclusion(s): The study revealed a high incidence of heparin failure in ECMO patients, especially in those with COVID-19. Heparin resistance had no effect on the incidence rate of thromboembolic events, whereas our data suggest an increased risk in patients with COVID19, VA ECMO and ECCO2R.

Echocardiographic findings in critically Ill patients with COVID-19 treated with and without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Objectives: There is a paucity of data on echocardiographic findings in patients with COVID-19 supported with Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO). This study aimed to compare baseline echocardiographic characteristics of mechanically ventilated patients for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 infection with and without VV ECMO support and to describe the incidence of new echocardiographic abnormalities in these patients. Method(s): Single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients admitted from March 2020 to June 2021 with COVID-19 infection, that required mechanical ventilation, and had an available echocardiogram within 72 hours of admission. Follow-up echocardiograms during ICU stay were reviewed. Result(s): A total of 242 patients were included in the study. One-hundred and forty-five (60%) patients were supported with VV ECMO. Median (IQR) PaO2/ FiO2 was 76 (65-95) and 98 (85-140) in the VV ECMO and non-ECMO patients, respectively (P = < 0.001). On the admission echocardiograms, the prevalence of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (10% vs 15%, P= 0.31) and right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction (38% vs. 27%, P = 0.27) was not significantly different in the ECMO and non-ECMO groups. However, there was a higher proportion of acute cor pulmonale (41% vs. 26 %, P = 0.02) in the ECMO group. During their ICU stay, echocardiographic RV systolic function worsened in 44 (36%) patients in the ECMO group compared with six (10%) patients in the non-ECMO group (P< 0.001). The overall odds ratio for death for patients with worsening RV systolic function was 1.8 (95% confidence interval 0.95-3.37). Conclusion(s): Echocardiographic findings suggested that the presence of RV systolic dysfunction in COVIDECMO patients was comparable to the non-ECMO group on admission. However, a higher percentage of patients on ECMO developed worsening RV systolic function during follow-up.

The ProtekDuo in ECMO configuration for ARDS secondary to COVID-19 - a systematic review

Objectives: Assessment of the literature on the ProtekDuo cannula when used as venopulmonary (V-P) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in ARDS secondary to COVID-19. Method(s): Systematic literature search in EMBASE, Medline (Pubmed) and NHS library using appropriate keywords as well as PICOS and PRISMA approach. Result(s): We found 285 publications, of which 5 publications met the search criteria and were included in this review. A total of 194 patients with COVID-19 related ARDS had a ProtekDuo placed to establish venovenous (V-V) ECMO and right ventricular (RV) support. Patients treated with the ProtekDuo cannula had survival rates between between the studies of 59 and 89%, with a significant survival compared to an invasive ventilation group or when compared to dual site V-V ECMO or other double lumen ECMO cannulas. One of the studies focused on extubation and early discontinuation of ventilator support, which the authors achieved in 100% of ProtekDuo patients. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was significantly reduced in the ProtekDuo versus other groups. Conclusion(s): The ProtekDuo displayed lower mortality rates, AKI occurrence and CRRT need as compared to other respiratory support modalities and has shown to be a game changer for ECMO support in patients suffering from COVID-19 ARDS. Many authors suggested the ProtekDuo for first line use in these patients.